Yes, Imam Ali (as) had sons named Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthman.

Firstly, all those names didn’t belong exclusively to the three caliphs. There were other people at that time whose names were Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthman, some of whom were very good people. So, just because two people have the same name doesn’t mean they are of the same character. Or if a criminal’s name is something does that mean we can’t use that name anymore? For example, the ex-King of Iran was ‘Mohammad Reza’. So, if I’ve named my son ‘Muhammad Reza’ does it mean I’ve named him after the king?!  Or the name of the chief of hypocrites in Madina at the time of the Prophet (P) was Abdullah (Ibn Obay). If anyone names his son Abdullah, can we say he has named him after the chief of hypocrites?!

Secondly:

1. As for Abu Bakr; that is a nick name. the actual name of the son of Imam Ali was either Abdullah or Muhammad. (in fact, the actual name of the first caliph was also Abdullah and Abu Bakr is his nick name).

2. As for Umar, his mother Sahba gave birth to her son during the reign of Umar. Historians assert that Omar imposed his name on the baby. (Ref. Balazari; Ansabul-Ashraaf vol1. P.297) You may say why did Imam Ali accept that? The answer is for the above mentioned reason, the Imam didn’t want to make a fight over a name that doesn’t belong to the caliphs.

3. As for Uthman, historians have mentioned that Imam Ali named his son Uthman after Uthman Ibn Math’oon عثمان بن مظعون who was an eminent companion of the Prophet (sawa) and the first Muslim who died in Madina.

Answered by: Sheikh Mansour Leghaei

Originally posted by www.askthesheikh.com